
Ad Replicator
TurboAgents Ad Replicator is an AI tool that reads a screenshot of an ad that is working, works out the structure underneath it — the hook, the visual device, where the offer sits, what carries the proof — and rebuilds that structure around your own product and logo as finished ad creative.
Screenshot an ad that works. Get the same structure, with your product in it.
Upload a screenshot of an ad you keep seeing, plus your product image, logo and value proposition. It reads the reference for its structure rather than its surface, then produces your version of it: your product, your brand, your offer, arranged the way the thing that is working is arranged.
Watch the 2-minute demo
The reason an ad works is usually structural.
When an ad runs for months, something underneath it is working — where the eye lands first, how quickly the offer arrives, whether the product is the hero or the proof, how much the image is doing versus how much the copy is doing. That structure is transferable between brands. The photography, the wording and the branding are not, and are not yours to take.
This separates the two. It reads the reference for its architecture, then rebuilds that architecture around your product, your logo and your offer. What comes back should share the reference’s bones and none of its skin:
- Ad structure
- The underlying arrangement — hook position, visual hierarchy, where the offer sits, how proof is carried. The transferable part of somebody else’s ad.
- Visual device
- The specific trick the ad uses to hold attention: a before-and-after split, a scale comparison, a hand entering frame, an unexpected surface.
- Value proposition
- The single claim your version has to land. Supplying it explicitly is what stops the output inheriting the reference’s message along with its layout.
- Swipe file
- A collection of ads worth learning from. Useful as reference, not as artwork — the point is to borrow the reasoning rather than the execution.
You save ads you admire and they stay in a folder, because there is no route from “this works” to “ours does this”. Describing a layout to a designer loses the thing you actually noticed, and handing the screenshot to a generic image tool produces a near-copy that is both derivative and risky.
How It Works
What You Get
- Finished ad creative — Your version of the reference structure, built around your product, logo and offer.
- A structural read of the reference — Hook position, visual hierarchy, where the offer sits and what carries the proof — the transferable part.
- Your product in the creative — The uploaded product image used as the hero, rather than a generated approximation of it.
- Your logo placed — Applied to the layout rather than left for you to composite afterwards.
- Your value proposition preserved — Stated explicitly so the output does not inherit the reference’s message along with its architecture.
- Multiple structural emphases — Product-led, problem-led, offer-led and proof-led reads of the same reference, so you have a set to test.
- Output sized for the placement — Generated for the format you are running, with the Creative Size Adaptor available for the full set.
Where other market research tools stop, this keeps going.
Most tools hand you a PDF and walk away. TurboAgents gives you two things a static report can’t: charts you can actually use, and an analyst you can actually talk to.
It takes the reasoning, not the artwork
The difference matters both creatively and legally. Copying an ad gives you something derivative that your audience may well recognise as somebody else’s. Taking the structure — where the eye goes, how fast the offer arrives, what carries the proof — gives you an ad that works for the same reasons while looking like you.
The same ad can teach you more than one thing
A strong reference usually contains several transferable ideas — the framing, the hierarchy, the way the offer is placed. Running it more than once with a different emphasis gives you a set to test rather than a single interpretation of what you thought you saw.
You noticed something you cannot put into words
The reason you saved the ad is rarely something you can brief. “Make the product bigger and put the offer lower” is not what you saw. Handing over the image keeps the observation intact, and the value proposition field keeps the message yours.
AI vs. briefing a designer vs. a generic image generator.
| Criteria | TurboAgents | Briefing a designer | Generic image AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turnaround | Under a minute | 3–7 days | Under a minute |
| Cost | From $29/mo | $300–1,200 per set | Varies |
| Reads the reference structurally | Yes | If they are good | No — it imitates |
| Uses your real product | Yes, uploaded | Yes | No |
| Keeps your message | Value proposition field | Via the brief | Often inherits theirs |
| Risk of a near-copy | Structure only | Low | High |
| Practical to test four reads | Yes | Four briefs | Yes, but off-brand |
Use Cases
- →
Marketer with a folder of saved ads — Turn the swipe file into actual creative instead of a collection you look at when you are stuck.
- →
Brand entering a proven category — Start from the structures the category has already validated rather than discovering them with your own budget.
- →
Performance team that needs volume — Produce several structurally different creatives quickly so the account has something to rotate before fatigue sets in.
- →
Founder without design vocabulary — Show the ad you like rather than trying to describe what you noticed about it.
- →
Agency in a new-business pitch — Demonstrate the client’s product in the structure of an ad the client already admires.
- →
Anyone whose designer keeps missing the brief — Remove the translation step where the thing you spotted gets lost between your eye and their file.
Frequently Asked Questions
A screenshot of the ad you want to learn from, your product image, and your logo if you have one. You also give your brand and product name, your value proposition and your audience.
No, and it is built specifically not to. It reads the reference for structure — hook position, visual hierarchy, where the offer sits — and rebuilds that around your product, your palette and your message. Structure is transferable; photography, wording and branding are not, and are not yours to take.
Because the reason you saved it is usually something you cannot put into words. “Make the product bigger” is not what you actually noticed. Handing over the image keeps the observation intact.
To keep the message yours. Without it, the output tends to inherit the reference’s claim along with its layout, which is how you end up running an ad that argues somebody else’s case.
Several. A strong reference usually contains more than one transferable idea, so running it with different emphases — product-led, problem-led, offer-led — gives you a set to test rather than one interpretation.
That is fine and common. The structure is what transfers, and the composition adapts to your product’s actual shape. A reference with a tall bottle still teaches a wide box something about hierarchy.
Yes, and it is worth doing on a live text layer afterwards in Layout, where you control the spelling and can change the offer later without regenerating anything.
You pick the output format for wherever the ad is running. For a full platform set, take the winner into the Creative Size Adaptor, which rebuilds it per ratio rather than cropping it.
Your tokens are returned automatically. You are never charged for creative that did not arrive.
Free for 2 days
Try Ad Replicator Free
Start 2-Day Trial · No meetings, no retainers · Cancel anytime

